Zilele trecute am văzut interviul lui Surovikin pentru R24.
Iată transcriptul. (memorare)
Interesant ce spune despre necesitatea retragerii populației civile (și, la nevoie, a retragerii militare) din Herson:
NATO leadership that leads the Armed Forces of Ukraine has long demanded the Kiev regime to conduct offensive operations towards Kherson, regardless of any casualties: neither in the AFU, nor among the civilian population.
We have got data on the possible use of prohibited methods of war by the Kiev regime near Kherson, on the preparation of a massive missile attack at the barrage of Kakhovka hydroelectric power plant, as well as launching a massive indiscriminate missile and artillery attack at the city.
This action can lead to the destruction of the infrastructure of a large industrial centre and high casualties among civilians.
In these conditions, our primary task is to save lives and health of civilians. That is why, first of all, the Russian army will provide safe departure of the population according to the resettlement programme that is currently being prepared by the Russian Government.
Azi îl aud pe JZS spunând aceleași lucruri:
Now everyone in the world must act powerfully and quickly to prevent a new Russian terrorist attack.
Destroying the dam would mean a large-scale disaster. With this terrorist attack, they can destroy, among other things, even the possibility of supplying water from the Dnipro River to Crimea.
In the event of the destruction of the Kakhovka HPP dam, the North Crimean Canal will simply disappear.
And if Russia is preparing such a terrorist attack, if it is seriously considering such a scenario, it means the terrorists are clearly aware that they will not be able to keep not only Kherson, but also the entire south of our country, including Crimea.
We must now all together – all Europeans, all world leaders, all international organizations – make it clear to the terrorist state that such a terrorist attack on the Kakhovka HPP will mean exactly the same as the use of weapons of mass destruction. The consequences for Russia should be corresponding.
The world must react – preventively. This is key now. The principle of preventive response to security threats should finally become one of the basic principles of international politics.
Well, pilgrims: you ain’t seen nothing yet!