Zice că e 70. SL vorbește pentru MK. SL, din nou. Iaca și MZ.
Samizdatul e strălucitor.
Dintr-un articol al lui yalensis am ajuns la Grover Furr. Foarte, foarte interesant!
Pe web-ul nost’ – o avalanșă de teorii ce egalează stalinismul cu neomarxismul, cu marxismul cultural.
DD:
UPDATE 20.04.2019: MID are și el un punct de vedere.
For Washington, NATO is indeed the most historically successful international instrument – a tool of control and subordination of its allies, and at the same time of legitimisation of US illegitimate actions in the international arena. NATO, in particular, has helped share responsibility for the aggression against Yugoslavia, which had the worst consequences for the Balkans and European security in general. The US administration is now unsuccessfully trying to monetise the security guarantees that the American military presence in Europe allegedly gives its European allies, demanding that defence spending be raised to 2 per cent of GDP. The American defence industry, which promotes its products for European rearmament programmes, is counting on a significant part – one-fifth – of this loyalty programme. It gets worse as it goes on: now Washington claims that countries hosting US troops must not only shoulder the full cost of their presence, but also add 50 per cent on top for such a privilege and protection. In other communities, this is called racketeering.